Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Paul Krugman on making Bush tax cuts permanent

He's not in favor of the idea:
How can this kind of giveaway be justified at a time when politicians claim to care about budget deficits? Well, history is repeating itself. The original campaign for the Bush tax cuts relied on deception and dishonesty. In fact, my first suspicions that we were being misled into invading Iraq were based on the resemblance between the campaign for war and the campaign for tax cuts the previous year. And sure enough, that same trademark deception and dishonesty is being deployed on behalf of tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.

So, for example, we’re told that it’s all about helping small business; but only a tiny fraction of small-business owners would receive any tax break at all. And how many small-business owners do you know making several million a year?

Or we’re told that it’s about helping the economy recover. But it’s hard to think of a less cost-effective way to help the economy than giving money to people who already have plenty, and aren’t likely to spend a windfall.

No, this has nothing to do with sound economic policy. Instead, as I said, it’s about a dysfunctional and corrupt political culture, in which Congress won’t take action to revive the economy, pleads poverty when it comes to protecting the jobs of schoolteachers and firefighters, but declares cost no object when it comes to sparing the already wealthy even the slightest financial inconvenience.

So far, the Obama administration is standing firm against this outrage. Let’s hope that it prevails in its fight. Otherwise, it will be hard not to lose all faith in America’s future.
Man, I wish I made enough to pay $3 million in Federal taxes.

Sphere: Related Content

2 comments:

  1. EdwardTuesday, August 24, 2010 4:56:00 AM

    "He's not in favor of the idea."

    Considering Paul's well know political leanings... are we suppose to be surprised?

    ReplyDelete
  2. kushiboTuesday, August 24, 2010 5:22:00 AM

    Well, the purpose of the post was to highlight the argument he made, not any feigned surprise on my part.

    ReplyDelete

Share your thoughts, but please be kind and respectful. My mom reads this blog.